ELECTRAFORCE
Developing kinetic energy-based electricity generators with an associated DAO and native coin, ELECTRA, conducting tests to minimize bugs.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 06:36 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
There is no information provided regarding the start date of the project, so it is unclear if it meets the age requirement.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
While the project description mentions electricity generators that could imply a reduction in GHGs, it does not explicitly outline how the project will reduce GHGs or its relation to core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha & Beta rounds. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha & Beta round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is insufficient information to determine if the project received previous funding and, if so, whether they have reported on project progress.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
Due to a lack of information on whether ELECTRAFORCE is a returning grantee and whether an updated proposal with the required details exists, it is not possible to accurately score this criterion.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The ELECTRAFORCE project claims to be working on 'electricity generators that will generate infinite electricity,' a concept that defies the physical law of conservation of energy and is broadly considered scientifically impossible. This inherently brings its viability into question, failing to meet the general expectation of credibility.