Drivyx ESG
Drivyx develops AI and blockchain-based tools for accessible and transparent ESG investing, aligning capital with projects supporting UN Sustainable Development Goals for global impact.Application
Applied on: 31 Jul 2024 05:21 AM
Approved
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 31 Jul 2024 06:01 AM
CollabTech project - organisations on-chain, evolution of B2B SaaS, network states tooling & DAO tooling, and future of work; projects advancing reputation, governance & decision making, operations (accounting, sales automation, inventory management, talent, etc), community, and contributor tooling!
The project aligns well with the CollabTech goals as it integrates ESG practices through blockchain and AI, enhancing governance, decision-making, and operations management. It also fosters community engagement and provides tools for contributors.
Commercial viability or perennial Public Goods: projects addressing a clear need for a specific target user and with the ability to continue to deliver value over time (financial sustainability through business model and/or immutability)
Drivyx targets specific users like SMEs, ESG consultants, investors, and larger corporations. The project promises sustainable financial models like premium subscriptions and marketplace commissions ensuring long-term value delivery.
Maximum project development duration of 12 weeks (i.e. value delivered within 12 weeks)
The project outlines that the Beta will be live in August, with further features being rolled out in Q4 2024. This exceeds the 12-week maximum project development duration requirement.
Threshold: Projects must declare a “threshold” (minimum amount of funds needed to complete the project/feature/prototype and deliver value). Thoroughness in defining their threshold and feasibility (threshold within the range of match-funding available) will be key for approval into the round. Projects not able to attain the threshold (with combined donations + match funding), will not receive match funding but can still keep donations.
The application does not provide specific information about the threshold of funds needed to complete the project or feature. This makes it challenging to assess feasibility and adherence to this criterion.
General Criteria: Incomplete, poorly structured, unfeasible, or otherwise poorly conceived applications will be rejected.
The application provides a detailed and structured description of the project, its target audience, and how it plans to deliver value. It appears both feasible and well-conceived.