Mckennedy
1. QFun: A card game designed to teach Quadratic Funding concepts and Sybil resilience through engaging gameplay and AI-assisted artwork. 2. Gitcoin Pacman: A twist on classic Pacman with the Gitcoin logo and anti-Sybil features, still in early development. 3. Meme Creation: Encouragement to contribute creative memes whenever possible for community enjoyment.User Review
R1
Reviewed on 26 Mar 2024 11:53 PM
This round focuses on *individuals only*. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission. We invite collaborators on one effort to submit grant proposals individually, detailing what and how they personally contributed. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.
Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
Essential intents: https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/update-gitcoin-s-ratified-essential-intents-2023-2024-and-a-recap-of-our-successes/16818
Ecosystem Collective: https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/introducing-gitcoin-s-ecosystem-collective/17954
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin. Some (non-exhaustive) examples:
- educational content, eg. a guide on how to donate on our platform
- promotional content, eg running a twitter space to cover our rounds
- data analysis, eg. a data analysis of previous donations
- operations, eg. running a grants round
- governance, eg. adding meaningful contributions to the forum discussions
- community support, eg. helping out users in our discord
- platform and protocol dev, eg. pull requests or standalone add-ons
This round will focus on retroactive work only, i.e. work delivered in the past. For planned work, go to http://gitcoin.co/citizens. Only one proposal is allowed per grantee.
All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing all captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views.) The submission should include proof of impact, including links to where the work was delivered and received (e.g, content creation needs supporting usage analytics, governance participation should have relevant links to gov posts, individual involvement in a collective effort should have specific dates, links to Twitter space, or recordings.)
The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received. Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. Examples of these include bug reports with minimal impact, non-strategic comments on the governance forum, translations of gitcoin content and other communication efforts which can easily be automated (AI, Google translate).
Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.
Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing
Double application
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 18 Mar 2024 06:59 PM
Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing
The provided information does not include a comprehensive review against the document's criteria, which would be necessary to determine full eligibility.
Individuals only. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.
The project name 'Mckennedy' appears to represent an individual, suggesting compliance with the individual-only requirement.
Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
The project, by creating a game explaining Quadratic Funding and promoting Gitcoin mechanisms, aligns with contributing educational content supporting Gitcoin's intents and focus areas.
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin.
The project description states specific contributions made to support Gitcoin, such as educational card game design and Gitcoin-themed gaming content.
This round will focus on rewarding retroactive work only
The description of 'Mckennedy' suggests that the work has already been completed (e.g., describing the card game as refined and artwork in progress), thus fulfilling retroactive work criteria.
All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing and linking to captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views)
While the project description mentions the creation of games and memes, there are no explicit references or links to captured data demonstrating the impact of this work.
Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received.
There is no proof provided to demonstrate that the efforts of the 'Mckennedy' project were well-received by the community or had considerable impact.
Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.
Without more detailed knowledge of the grantee's association with Gitcoin and previous payments, it's impossible to determine whether the work has already been compensated.