User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 12 Aug 2024 03:01 PM
The Grant must be in support of or directly advance the Asian public goods ecosystem; or at least one founder identifies him/herself as Asian. We will refer to the [public goods report](https://www.gccofficial.org/explore.html#report) released by GCC last December for the definition of public goods.
At least one founder, Rahul Deshpande, identifies himself as Asian.
The project must clearly articulate the problem it addresses, the solution, the implementation plan, the financial plan, and demonstrate there is an excellent team or community for execution
The project application lacks specific details about the problem, solution, implementation plan, financial plan, and does not provide substantial evidence of an active and competent team or community.
Project must be 3 months old and the project must demonstrate some tangible progress towards their stated goals, with a working MVP is available to the public. We will use Twitter, official website, github, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
Insufficient public information available (no official website, Twitter, Github) to determine the project's age and progress.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
No evidence or indication of malicious activities or Sybil attacks.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and [eligibility criteria](https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/gg21-community-round-eligibility-criteria/19003).
Lack of detailed project information prevents a thorough evaluation against Gitcoin's core rules and eligibility criteria.