User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 30 Mar 2024 08:01 AM
Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing
The provided information does not detail how the project l;l;,,l adheres to the full eligibility criteria.
This round focuses on *individuals only*. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission. We invite collaborators on one effort to submit grant proposals individually, detailing what and how they personally contributed. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.
The project name 'l;l;,,l' does not indicate the name of an individual Gitcoin Citizen, therefore, it does not meet this criterion.
Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
The project description 'klmlkjlkjlkjjlkljkklj' is not comprehensible and provides no information on how the work contributes to Gitcoin's Essential Intents or the Ecosystem Collective's focus areas.
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin.
The project description 'klmlkjlkjlkjjlkljkklj' does not explicitly outline any support for Gitcoin.
This round will focus on retroactive work only, i.e. work delivered in the past. For planned work, go to http://gitcoin.co/citizens. Only one proposal is allowed per grantee.
The submission does not provide any information that confirms the work is retroactive.
All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing all captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views.) The submission should include proof of impact, including links to where the work was delivered and received (e.g, content creation needs supporting usage analytics, governance participation should have relevant links to gov posts, individual involvement in a collective effort should have specific dates, links to Twitter space, or recordings.)
The submission does not include any captured data or proof of impact, nor does it provide links to the work delivered.
The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received. Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. Examples of these include bug reports with minimal impact, non-strategic comments on the governance forum, translations of gitcoin content and other communication efforts which can easily be automated (AI, Google translate).
Since no proof of impact is provided, it cannot be determined if the effort was well-received or if it had any significant impact.
Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.
There is insufficient information to determine whether the individual has been paid previously for the same work by Gitcoin.