ECOHUELLAS
Non-profit Ecohuellas empowers Colombians through regenerative entrepreneurship, focusing on environmental impact, job creation, and using Web3 technologies for transparent, inclusive, and sustainable community development.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 04:43 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided details do not specify the project start date, making it impossible to determine its age.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The provided information emphasizes on empowerment and regenerative entrepreneurship, but it is not clear how exactly this reduces GHGs or contributes to core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
Lack of details regarding previous funding rounds or project progress updates makes it impossible to confirm if this criterion is met.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
There is no information provided that reflects an updated proposal, lessons learned, or plans for use of additional funding, which prevents assessment of whether there is compliance with this requirement.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
Based on the provided description, the project seems to be addressing genuine social and environmental issues and incorporates Web3 technologies, aligning with the realm of viability for climate solutions.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is insufficient information to assess whether the project has been involved in any manipulative activities related to the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.