Urbanika
A traveling educational project that seeks to teach 300 Latin Americans about blockchain, AI, and post-capitalism through workshops, meetups, and movie nights, using a bus turned into a mobile school starting in 2023.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 04:13 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project's age is not specified, therefore it cannot be determined from the provided information whether or not the project meets the age requirement.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project involves educating changemakers on regenerative city making and spreading the word of a multichain world, ReFi, and the Commons, which can indirectly contribute to reducing GHGs by promoting smart, ethical, and regenerative urban development.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
The project's description does not mention any prior funding rounds or the progress made since then, making it impossible to assess if they have complied with this requirement.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The provided information does not make it clear whether Urbánika is a returning grantee or if they have updated their proposal as per the criterion.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project has outlined a clear plan and budget for educating changemakers and transforming the bus into a traveling school and artistic fair, which seems within the realm of viability to the average person familiar with web3 technology and climate solutions.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
No evidence or suggestion of enabling Sybil attacks or malicious manipulation of the grants platform is presented in the provided information.