Ekonavi
Ekonavi supports ecological initiatives worldwide focusing on agroforestry, bioconstruction, permaculture, sustainable energy, and decentralized finance to foster community-led environmental regeneration.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 04:20 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided information lacks specific details about the age of the project 'Ekonavi'. To accurately assess this criterion, the project start date or project establishment information is needed.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
Ekonavi's description indicates a primary focus on ecological initiatives such as agroforestry, bioconstruction, sustainable energies and decentralized finance, all of which can contribute to GHG reduction and are related to web3 climate solutions. The project supports tree planting, the construction of greenhouses, and sustainable material use, directly tying to climate solution efforts.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is no information provided about whether 'Ekonavi' has received funding in previous rounds. Thus, it is not possible to assess if they have reported on their progress as required for this criterion.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
Since it is unclear whether 'Ekonavi' is a returning grantee and whether they have an updated proposal that meets these requirements, an accurate evaluation cannot be provided.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The description of 'Ekonavi' suggests that it is contributing to ecological activities and community innovation, which appear to be realistic and credible endeavors within the realm of climate solutions and web3 technology. With no evidence suggesting otherwise, the project is deemed as operating within the 'realm of viability'.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence provided indicating that 'Ekonavi' is encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or any other form of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.