Wild Friends: Play to save wildlife
Developing a Web3 platform where wildlife sanctuaries receive donations through NFTs, which offer access to a video game for interaction with digital animals and sanctuary cameras.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 04:38 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
There is no clear information on the project establishment date provided.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project seems to be primarily focused on wildlife conservation through digital engagement, which does not directly indicate how it will help reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) or act as core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
It is not mentioned whether the project has received funding in previous rounds, and there is no progress report provided.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
There is no information on whether they are a returning grantee. Without this, we cannot determine if they've updated their proposal and provided the required information.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project appears to be within the 'realm of viability', with a clear plan, partnership with an animal sanctuary, and team members with relevant experience mentioned.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence provided to suggest that the project is involved in Sybil attacks or malicious manipulation of the Gitcoin community.