Augmenting the ReFi Knowledge Graph with AI
Myseelia develops an AI-powered interface for exploring the ReFi Knowledge Graph, enabling users to interact naturally and gain insights to promote regenerative finance and education.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 04:07 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided information lacks specific details about the project's start date and operation duration.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project aims to foster collective intelligence for the regenerative finance ecosystem, which pertains to climate action and sustainable economic practices that could indirectly reduce GHG emissions through informed decision-making and support for climate-positive projects.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
The information given does not indicate whether this project has received previous rounds of funding, thereby the progress report since past rounds cannot be assessed.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
As it is unclear if the project has been a grantee before, it cannot be determined if the proposal has been updated accordingly.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project aligns with web3 technology use and supports climate solutions through knowledge sharing and decision-making tools. It seems viable and credible within the scope of current technological capabilities and the founders' apparent intent.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no indication in the information provided that the project or the project leaders are involved in enabling Sybil attacks or other malicious manipulations.