Planetary Council
Implementing systemic change to achieve a sustainable, equitable world through spontaneous cooperation and without harming the environment or disadvantaging individuals. Emphasizes updating democracy and global coordination.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 05:15 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided information does not specify the age of the 'Planetary Council' project, and thus it is not possible to determine from the given data whether the project meets the 3-month age requirement.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The description provided for the 'Planetary Council' project does not explicitly outline how the project will help reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. The focus seems to be on broader systemic change and international governance rather than specific climate action or web3 infrastructure.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha & Beta rounds. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha & Beta round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
The provided details do not indicate whether the 'Planetary Council' has received funding in previous rounds, nor is there a progress report available in the description to assess compliance with this requirement.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
It is not clear from the provided information if 'Planetary Council' is a returning grantee. Consequently, there is no updated proposal, lessons learned, or funding usage plan provided that could be evaluated.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The provided material does not give sufficient information to assess the 'Planetary Council' project's viability in relation to web3 technology and climate solutions, nor does it clearly show the founders' intent and plans to actualize the project. Without more substantive evidence, it is difficult to confidently evaluate the project's viability or the founders' intentions.