CleanApp Launch
Crowdsourced global game for waste/hazard mapping, rewarding cleaners with ERC20 tokens, with property operators subscribing to access data, exchangeable on Uniswap.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 05:14 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project's establishment date is not provided, therefore it cannot be determined if it meets the 3-month threshold.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project, CleanApp Launch, focuses on waste/hazard management, which is related to climate solutions. However, the direct correlation to GHG reduction is not explicit, but it could be argued as an indirect benefit.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha & Beta rounds. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha & Beta round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is no information provided regarding previous rounds of funding or progress reports, therefore it cannot be determined if this criterion is met.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
It is not clear whether the project is a returning grantee or if the proposal has been updated with the required information, hence an uncertain score.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project description suggests a viable and credible initiative to manage waste and hazards using a web3 approach, indicating that it meets the criteria for being within the 'realm of viability'.