User Review
R1
Reviewed on 1 Apr 2024 10:25 PM
This round focuses on *individuals only*. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission. We invite collaborators on one effort to submit grant proposals individually, detailing what and how they personally contributed. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.
Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
Essential intents: https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/update-gitcoin-s-ratified-essential-intents-2023-2024-and-a-recap-of-our-successes/16818
Ecosystem Collective: https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/introducing-gitcoin-s-ecosystem-collective/17954
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin. Some (non-exhaustive) examples:
- educational content, eg. a guide on how to donate on our platform
- promotional content, eg running a twitter space to cover our rounds
- data analysis, eg. a data analysis of previous donations
- operations, eg. running a grants round
- governance, eg. adding meaningful contributions to the forum discussions
- community support, eg. helping out users in our discord
- platform and protocol dev, eg. pull requests or standalone add-ons
This round will focus on retroactive work only, i.e. work delivered in the past. For planned work, go to http://gitcoin.co/citizens. Only one proposal is allowed per grantee.
All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing all captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views.) The submission should include proof of impact, including links to where the work was delivered and received (e.g, content creation needs supporting usage analytics, governance participation should have relevant links to gov posts, individual involvement in a collective effort should have specific dates, links to Twitter space, or recordings.)
The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received. Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. Examples of these include bug reports with minimal impact, non-strategic comments on the governance forum, translations of gitcoin content and other communication efforts which can easily be automated (AI, Google translate).
Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.
Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing
This is not relevant for Gitcoin - please reapply to one of the community rounds
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 29 Mar 2024 08:07 AM
Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing
Insufficient information provided in the query to determine if the project 'FUTURE FURY' meets all the requirements detailed in the document. An evaluator would need to assess the project against the full eligibility document.
Individuals only. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.
The project 'FUTURE FURY' seems to represent a game or collective project rather than an individual contribution, and no individual Gitcoin Citizen's name is indicated in the title of the grant submission as required.
Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
The 'Endless Runner and Shooter Game' does not appear to directly contribute to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin.
The provided description of 'FUTURE FURY' does not outline any specific support to Gitcoin or its mission.
This round will focus on rewarding retroactive work only
There is no information on whether the work by 'FUTURE FURY' is retroactive or planned for the future.
All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing and linking to captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views)
No impact data, references, or links are provided in the submission details for the 'FUTURE FURY' project.
Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received.
No proof of impact or reception data is provided, therefore we cannot conclude that 'FUTURE FURY' had a well-received impact.
Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.
There is no information on whether the work from 'FUTURE FURY' was previously compensated by Gitcoin or if it falls outside the scope of contracted work.