User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 4 Aug 2024 10:01 AM
The Grant must be in support of or directly advance the Asian public goods ecosystem; or at least one founder identifies him/herself as Asian. We will refer to the [public goods report](https://www.gccofficial.org/explore.html#report) released by GCC last December for the definition of public goods.
The project aims to improve waste management in Asia and involves Asian builders as evidenced by team details on the Gitbook link.
The project must clearly articulate the problem it addresses, the solution, the implementation plan, the financial plan, and demonstrate there is an excellent team or community for execution
The project description provides clarity on the problem (waste management), proposed solutions (incentivization, community engagement, policy support), implementation plan, and financial goals. The team details are provided in the Gitbook link.
Project must be 3 months old and the project must demonstrate some tangible progress towards their stated goals, with a working MVP is available to the public. We will use Twitter, official website, github, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The age and progress of the project cannot be confirmed due to the lack of activity on Twitter, Github, or an official website link.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence to suggest that the project is encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and [eligibility criteria](https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/gg21-community-round-eligibility-criteria/19003).
Based on the provided answers and description, the project appears to comply with Gitcoin core rules and eligibility criteria.