Token Engineering Commons
Token engineering ensures safe, resilient blockchain systems through engineering discipline. It fosters public trust in crypto-economic systems, with significant contributions to grants and funding mechanisms for Web3 technologies.Application
Applied on: 14 Aug 2024 08:22 PM
Pending
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Aug 2024 09:01 PM
CollabTech project - organisations on-chain, evolution of B2B SaaS, network states tooling & DAO tooling, and future of work; projects advancing reputation, governance & decision making, operations (accounting, sales automation, inventory management, talent, etc), community, and contributor tooling!
The project focuses on advancing governance, decision making, and token mechanics within the framework of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), which align with the criteria of advancing reputation, governance, and decision making.
Commercial viability or perennial Public Goods: projects addressing a clear need for a specific target user and with the ability to continue to deliver value over time (financial sustainability through business model and/or immutability)
The project addresses a clear need in the ReFi and climate-positive blockchain space by offering tools for efficient and fair fund distribution. Its open-source nature and emphasis on adaptability for various communities ensure ongoing and expanding value delivery.
Maximum project development duration of 12 weeks (i.e. value delivered within 12 weeks)
The project's timeline indicates value delivery spread from late August 2024 to December 2024, which exceeds the maximum development duration of 12 weeks.
Threshold: Projects must declare a “threshold” (minimum amount of funds needed to complete the project/feature/prototype and deliver value). Thoroughness in defining their threshold and feasibility (threshold within the range of match-funding available) will be key for approval into the round. Projects not able to attain the threshold (with combined donations + match funding), will not receive match funding but can still keep donations.
The project application did not specify a required threshold amount. Lack of clarity on the threshold makes it difficult to assess compliance with this criterion.
General Criteria: Incomplete, poorly structured, unfeasible, or otherwise poorly conceived applications will be rejected.
The application is well-structured, comprehensive, and seems feasible but it lacks the declaration of a threshold which is critical for approval.