Hedging Impermanent Loss

Hedging Impermanent Loss

Developing smart contracts to help AMM liquidity providers hedge against impermanent loss, enabling effective risk management in high-volatility environments through options-based hedging on DeFi platforms.
Application
Applied on: 5 Aug 2024 08:50 PM
Rejected
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 5 Aug 2024 09:02 PM
CollabTech project - organisations on-chain, evolution of B2B SaaS, network states tooling & DAO tooling, and future of work; projects advancing reputation, governance & decision making, operations (accounting, sales automation, inventory management, talent, etc), community, and contributor tooling!
The project description includes elements of B2B SaaS and community empowerment through governance framework, which fits within CollabTech objectives. However, it is primarily focused on DeFi and risk management, which may not fully meet the broader criteria.
Commercial viability or perennial Public Goods: projects addressing a clear need for a specific target user and with the ability to continue to deliver value over time (financial sustainability through business model and/or immutability)
The project addresses a specific need for DeFi liquidity providers to manage and hedge against Impermanent Loss. It also has a business model (fees collected) and an open-source approach which ensures continuous value delivery.
Maximum project development duration of 12 weeks (i.e. value delivered within 12 weeks)
The project has provided a timeline of 2.5 months (approximately 10 weeks) to complete the smart contracts and testing. This is within the 12-week requirement.
Threshold: Projects must declare a “threshold” (minimum amount of funds needed to complete the project/feature/prototype and deliver value). Thoroughness in defining their threshold and feasibility (threshold within the range of match-funding available) will be key for approval into the round.
The project description does not mention a specific threshold amount needed for completion. Without this information, it's unclear if the threshold is feasible and within the range of match-funding available.
General Criteria: Incomplete, poorly structured, unfeasible, or otherwise poorly conceived applications will be rejected.
The application is well-structured, and the project concept is feasible and clearly described. The team has provided ample details about the project objectives, target users, and development timeline.