Ygg Anderson builds Alloha: Tunable QF Framework application on Gitcoin Citizens Retro Round #3

Home Projects Rounds

Ygg Anderson builds Alloha: Tunable QF Framework

Ygg Anderson builds Alloha: Tunable QF Framework

Developing a web app that modifies donation weights using community tokens, badges, and reputation to influence quadratic funding outcomes for public goods.

Application

Applied on: 18 Mar 2024 05:15 PM

Round: Gitcoin Citizens Retro Round #3

Approved

User Reviews

Reviewed on 26 Mar 2024 12:14 AM

This round focuses on *individuals only*. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission. We invite collaborators on one effort to submit grant proposals individually, detailing what and how they personally contributed. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.

Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas. Essential intents: https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/update-gitcoin-s-ratified-essential-intents-2023-2024-and-a-recap-of-our-successes/16818 Ecosystem Collective: https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/introducing-gitcoin-s-ecosystem-collective/17954

The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin. Some (non-exhaustive) examples: - educational content, eg. a guide on how to donate on our platform - promotional content, eg running a twitter space to cover our rounds - data analysis, eg. a data analysis of previous donations - operations, eg. running a grants round - governance, eg. adding meaningful contributions to the forum discussions - community support, eg. helping out users in our discord - platform and protocol dev, eg. pull requests or standalone add-ons

This round will focus on retroactive work only, i.e. work delivered in the past. For planned work, go to http://gitcoin.co/citizens. Only one proposal is allowed per grantee.

All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing all captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views.) The submission should include proof of impact, including links to where the work was delivered and received (e.g, content creation needs supporting usage analytics, governance participation should have relevant links to gov posts, individual involvement in a collective effort should have specific dates, links to Twitter space, or recordings.)

The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received. Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. Examples of these include bug reports with minimal impact, non-strategic comments on the governance forum, translations of gitcoin content and other communication efforts which can easily be automated (AI, Google translate).

Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.

Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing

                                Amazing work as a part of the TEC! Unfortunately it appears this work has already been compensated.
                            

Reviewed on 23 Mar 2024 08:12 PM

This round will focus on retroactive work only, i.e. work delivered in the past. For planned work, go to http://gitcoin.co/citizens. Only one proposal is allowed per grantee.

Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.

Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing

AI Reviews

Reviewed on 18 Mar 2024 07:03 PM

Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing

                                    The link to full eligibility criteria is provided, but this AI does not have the capability to access external documents to verify if the project meets all the listed criteria.
                                

Individuals only. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.

                                    The project title 'Ygg Anderson builds Alloha: Tunable QF Framework' clearly indicates the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen (Ygg Anderson) being rewarded.
                                

Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.

                                    The project contributes directly to Gitcoin by building a framework to enhance Quadratic Funding, which aligns with Gitcoin’s Essential Intents to support public goods and the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
                                

The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin.

                                    The project description outlines that it supports Gitcoin by creating a framework to apply subject matter expertise to QF outcomes, directly contributing to the Gitcoin ecosystem.
                                

This round will focus on rewarding retroactive work only.

                                    The grant application specifies that the work has already been used by the Token Engineering Commons for community QF round, indicating it is retroactive work.
                                

All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing and linking to captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views).

                                    While the project claims to be in use by Token Engineering Commons, there are no explicit quantitative metrics or links provided to verify the impact of the work.
                                

Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received.

                                    The application indicates the project is in use, suggesting some level of impact, but without data on reception or how well it was received, it cannot be conclusively scored.
                                

Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.

                                    There is no indication in the provided information that the grantee has already been compensated by Gitcoin for this work, suggesting they meet this criterion.
                                

Reviewed on 18 Mar 2024 07:03 PM

Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing

                                    Without information on the project's compliance with each specific point in the full eligibility criteria document, an accurate assessment cannot be made.
                                

Individuals only. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.

                                    The title of the project indicates it is submitted by an individual, Ygg Anderson.
                                

                                    The project contributes to Gitcoin's Essential Intents by creating a data science framework for quadratic funding, which aligns with supporting public goods and enhancing community decision-making.
                                

The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin.

                                    The project description outlines the support to Gitcoin by providing a tool that modifies donation weights for quadratic funding, facilitating more effective public goods funding.
                                

This round will focus on rewarding retroactive work only

                                    The submission indicates that the tool is currently being used by the Token Engineering Commons, suggesting the work has already been delivered.
                                

                                    The submission does not provide explicit links to captured data demonstrating the impact of the work. Additional information is required for a clear assessment.
                                

Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received.

                                    The submission does not provide sufficient proof of impact or evidence indicating that the efforts were well-received, requiring more information for proper evaluation.
                                

Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.

                                    There is no information provided regarding any previous payments by Gitcoin for the same work, so it is unclear if this criterion is met.
                                

Back to Round