DSPYT - Gitcoin Growth through Content by Dmitrii Fedotov
Managing and coding for DSPYT, I create and optimize Google-indexed content, analyze Gitcoin data, and boost public awareness of Gitcoin and digital financing.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 7 Apr 2024 07:00 AM
This round focuses on *individuals only*. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission. We invite collaborators on one effort to submit grant proposals individually, detailing what and how they personally contributed. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.
The project title 'Gitcoin Growth through Content by Dmitrii Fedotov' indicates that it is a submission by an individual named Dmitrii Fedotov, meeting the requirement for individual submissions.
Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
The submitted work includes content creation related to Gitcoin, such as data analysis posts, increasing the platform's visibility and supporting its governance, which aligns with the essential intents and the Ecosystem Collective's focus areas.
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin.
The grant proposal details the creation and dissemination of educational content, data analysis, and promotion activities on various platforms that support Gitcoin's mission, which demonstrates how Dmitrii Fedotov supported Gitcoin.
This round will focus on retroactive work only, i.e. work delivered in the past. For planned work, go to http://gitcoin.co/citizens. Only one proposal is allowed per grantee.
The work described in the proposal such as the Gitcoin beta round data analysis and contributions to the Gitcoin Governance Forum has already been delivered in the past, addressing the requirement for retroactive work.
All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing all captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views.) The submission should include proof of impact, including links to where the work was delivered and received (e.g, content creation needs supporting usage analytics, governance participation should have relevant links to gov posts, individual involvement in a collective effort should have specific dates, links to Twitter space, or recordings.)
The proposal includes data from Google Search Console, Twitter Impressions, SimilarWeb, and Ahrefs, as well as specific views and likes metrics from the Gitcoin Governance Forum and dspyt.com, fulfilling the requirement to outline the impact with quantitative data.
The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received. Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. Examples of these include bug reports with minimal impact, non-strategic comments on the governance forum, translations of gitcoin content and other communication efforts which can easily be automated (AI, Google translate).
The impact is demonstrated with metrics such as 2.5k views and 40 likes on a Gitcoin Grants analysis post, signifying that the work was well-received by the community, thereby meeting the requirement of showing substantial impact.
Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.
The information provided does not specify whether the work by Dmitrii Fedotov has been previously compensated by Gitcoin under a different program like Citizens Innovate or Forward, thus the certainty of this criterion cannot be established without further investigation.
Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing
Without access to the information inside the provided document, assessing the complete adherence to all eligibility criteria is not possible, resulting in an uncertain score.