Undo
Promote sustainability and reduce GHG emissions through tree planting, waste reduction programs, energy efficiency workshops, support for public transport, bike paths, community gardens, renewable energy projects, eco-friendly campaigns, cleanups, and policy advocacy.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:57 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
There is not enough information provided to determine the age of the project 'Undo'. Neither the date of domain registration nor the creation date of the project's Twitter account is provided.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project 'Undo' outlines various activities that directly relate to climate solutions, such as tree planting, promoting energy efficiency, and supporting renewable energy projects, which all contribute to the reduction of GHGs.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is no information on whether 'Undo' has received previous funding, nor is there an update provided on progress or impact. Therefore, it is unclear if this eligibility requirement is met.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
There is no indication in the provided information that 'Undo' is a returning grantee with a proposal update that includes lessons learned, usage of additional funding, or a timeline for the project.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project 'Undo' seems to be within the 'realm of viability' as it aims to promote climate solutions through various community initiatives. However, the lack of specific web3 technology utilization is noted.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information to suggest that 'Undo' has engaged in Sybil attacks or malicious manipulation, but without further data, this cannot be confirmed.