dMeter EBF Hypercert
Pilot project using distributed ledger technology to track and verify ecological impacts of tree planting, featuring decentralization, local involvement, and open-source methodologies, aimed at scaling regenerative actions and recognizing broader ecological benefits.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:51 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided information does not include specific data regarding the project's age such as Twitter account creation date, web domain registration date, or other public info that confirms the project's age.
- The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. - Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
The project 'dMeter EBF Hypercert' is explicitly focused on climate solutions, including dMRV (decentralized Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification) and ecological data NFTs which align with the examples provided like DMRV and Carbon Accounting.
- Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. - We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
The information provided does not clearly indicate whether this project has received previous funding rounds from Gitcoin, nor does it detail any updates on progress and impact in the case that they have. Additionally, it's not clear whether they have minted Hypercerts which would relate to this criteria.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
There is no clear information provided about whether this project is a returning grantee and, if so, whether an updated proposal with lessons learned, projected use of additional funding, and a rough timeline are provided.
- There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. - Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. - Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
dMeter EBF Hypercert appears to adhere to practical schemes of dMRV and data-backed ecological credits, which seem credible and important initiatives in the realm of web3 technology and climate solutions, thus adhering to the viability criterion.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence provided in the submission to suggest that the project is associated with encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or malicious manipulation of platforms; however, a thorough investigation is required to confirm this.