Nawonmesh - Regenerating Buxar (Bihar, India)
Environmental project targets reducing agriculture-related GHG emissions in India's Buxar district through regenerative farming, solar-powered irrigation, waterbody restoration, and forest cover renewal over a projected timeline of 5 years with a $400,000 budget.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:52 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
Based on the project description, which includes past activities and a timeline, it appears the project has been active for over a year.
- The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. - Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
The project aims to reduce GHG emissions in the farm sector, focusing on sustainable agriculture, renewable energy, water conservation, and forestry, aligning with climate solution goals.
- Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. - We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
The project has included an update on previous funding usage for travel expenses. However, there is no mention of minting Hypercerts, though this is not required for a positive evaluation on progress.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The proposal contains detailed descriptions of various project components, future plans, a timeline, and a breakdown of expenses, illustrating how additional funds will be utilized.
- There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. - Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. - Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project seems credible as it includes detailed strategies and engages with web3 advisors. The team consists of individuals with backgrounds in environmentalism, agriculture, and energy, indicating an intent and capability to execute the project.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information provided that indicates the project has been involved in Sybil attacks or malicious activities; however, without a thorough investigation, definitive assurance cannot be granted.