Test Grant: Save the Unicorns
Create an eye-catching summary for project onboarding with bullet points, updates for previous grantees, clear section headings, and image insertion instructions.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 02:58 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
There is no provided information regarding the age of the 'Test Grant: Save the Unicorns' project.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The provided project description does not explicitly outline how the project will help reduce GHG emissions or is related to core web3 climate solutions. The information given does not relate to climate action but appears to be a placeholder for onboarding tests.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is no information provided on whether this project has received funding in previous rounds or any progress reports, hence the evaluation is uncertain.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The information available does not specify if the project is a returning grantee or if the proposal has been updated to include lessons learned, additional funding usage, and a timeline for the project.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project described does not seem credible as a climate solution and appears to not be within the 'realm of viability' for the intended funding round. The description provided does not demonstrate an intention to build a project focused on climate solutions.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information provided about the project's involvement in malicious activities such as Sybil attacks; therefore, an assessment cannot be made.