Web3beach
Fostering web3 education and real-world impact in underserved communities through environmental initiatives, health services, and micro-grants, while expanding Impact Onboarding programs in Latin America.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 03:45 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
Web3beach has outlined activities and references to work since GR15, indicating that the project has been active for a duration exceeding 3 months.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project mentions 'Environmental Impact - Beach clean ups' as one of its services since GR15, which aligns with climate solutions and GHG reduction goals.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
The project provided evidence of activities such as beach clean-ups and expanding programs, thereby reporting on progress since GR15.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
While Web3beach has provided an update on their activities, they have not detailed specific lessons learned from previous work or outlined how they would use additional funding, nor have they provided a rough timeline for their project's goals.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project appears to be feasible and credible with concrete actions such as environmental clean-ups and educational initiatives, which suggests an intention to build and achieve objectives.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information provided that indicates whether Web3beach has been involved in Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation, therefore the score is uncertain without further investigation.