Supabloom
Supabloom: A multi-dimensional ReFi base layer for creating permissionless, regenerative applications, facilitating onchain carbon project development, purchase agreements, tokenization, decentralized registries, and verifier integration.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 03:44 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided information does not specify the exact start date of the project, making it impossible to ascertain whether it meets the 3-month requirement.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
Supabloom appears to offer infrastructure to support regenerative applications, including facilitating carbon credit transactions and launching decentralized registries, which are directly related to climate solutions and the reduction of GHGs.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is no information provided regarding previous funding rounds or reports on project progress since then, so it is impossible to evaluate compliance with this requirement.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
There is no information provided about any updated proposal, previous work, lessons learned, or use of additional funding, nor is there a rough timeline for the project's overarching goals.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
Supabloom's project description, while lacking detailed specifics, presents a solution that appears to align with current web3 technologies and the objective of aiding in climate solutions, and does not suggest any aspect of it is impossible.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
Based on the information provided, there are no allegations or evidence suggesting that Supabloom has been involved in encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other malicious manipulations.