Climate Solutions Round
Create a concise onboarding video text for a climate action grant application, including summary, key points, previous grant updates, structural tips, and image insertion guide.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:26 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided information does not indicate the age of the 'Climate Solutions Round' project. A Twitter link is provided, but no specific information regarding the project's start date or domain registration date has been presented. Thus, it cannot be determined if the project meets the 3-month age criterion.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
Based on the description provided, the project seems to be a general onboarding video for creating grants, rather than being primarily focused on climate solutions or directly involved in the reduction of GHGs or contributing to core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
The information provided does not specify whether the 'Climate Solutions Round' project has previously received funding and therefore does not include an update on progress and impact or highlight any challenges faced, as per the requirement.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
There is no updated proposal or evidence of a previous grant to update from, nor are lessons learned or a rough timeline presented within the information provided.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant.
The provided description does not indicate the viability of the project related to climate solutions, nor does it provide information about the team's expertise, qualifications, or skills that would allow an assessment of the project's credibility in the field of climate solutions and web3 technology.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no specific information provided that suggests the 'Climate Solutions Round' project has engaged in encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other malicious activities. However, due to limited information, it cannot be definitively concluded whether they have engaged in such activities or not.