RegenBuild 🏡
RegenBuild is developing a blockchain protocol for assessing, reporting, and funding the sustainability of buildings across their lifecycle, aiming to transform the AECO industry’s impact on the environment.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:30 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided information does not include specific dates that can verify the age of the project, such as the registration date of the web domain or the creation date of the associated Twitter account.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. - Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
The project RegenBuild is focused on the built environment and aims to reduce carbon emissions, waste generation, and water consumption, which are directly linked to climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. - We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
There is no information provided regarding past funding rounds or updates on the progress and impact of the project, nor is there mention of minting Hypercerts.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
There is no indication that RegenBuild has received previous grants through Gitcoin, and therefore, there is no updated proposal or demonstrated lessons learned available.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. - Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. - Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project is presented as viable with a clear outline of its mission, impact, work done, and team expertise, including the founder's background and a research lead with relevant qualifications.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence or mention of the project or its members being involved in Sybil attacks or malicious manipulation within the information provided.