Ekonavi
Ekonavi supports ecological initiatives worldwide focusing on agroforestry, bioconstruction, permaculture, sustainable energy, and decentralized finance to foster community-led environmental regeneration.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:18 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided information lacks specific dates of Ekonavi's web domain registration or Twitter account creation, making it impossible to verify the project's age.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. - Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
Ekonavi's description indicates that it is focused on supporting ecological initiatives, including sustainable energy and agroforestry, which aligns with the goal of reducing GHGs and contributing to climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. - We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
There is no information provided about whether Ekonavi has received previous funding or on their progress, challenges, or whether they have minted Hypercerts.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The provided information does not include an updated proposal, nor does it mention previous rounds of funding or lessons learned, so it is unclear whether Ekonavi is a returning grantee in this context.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. - Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. - Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project description of Ekonavi demonstrates a viable and credible initiative with a clear focus on ecology and sustainability, which is within the realm of possibility. However, detailed information regarding the team's expertise and qualifications is not provided, which is necessary for a comprehensive assessment.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information provided that would indicate whether Ekonavi has engaged in such malicious activities, therefore an assessment cannot be made without further investigation.