Kula Earth Regenerative Commons
Fostering urban regeneration and ecological sanctuaries through regenerative design, community collaboration, and global knowledge-sharing. Promoting biodiversity, local stewardship, and sustainable living in urban environments.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:41 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
While the project claims to have been active for the past 3 months, there's no specific data provided regarding the exact creation date of their web domain or Twitter account to confirm their age.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project appears to be focused on climate solutions, specifically urban regeneration, permaculture, and creation of green spaces, which contribute to CO2 sequestration and reduction of heat islands in urban settings.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
It is not clear from the provided information whether the project received previous funding and if they've provided updates on progress or impact accordingly.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
There is no information provided that confirms whether the project is a returning grantee or not, and therefore we cannot assess if an updated proposal has been provided.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions.
Given the detailed description of the project's actions and intentions, it falls within the realm of viability by showing practical efforts and understanding in web3 technology and climate solutions.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information provided concerning any engagement in Sybil attacks or enabling forms of malicious manipulation, making it uncertain to assess.