Oxygenchain
Incentivizes eco-friendly waste treatment using IoT sensors and data transparency to reward compliance with environmental regulations.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:36 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The submission does not contain information about the project's start date, Twitter creation date, or web domain registration date.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
Oxygenchain’s project proposal fits the theme as it aims to incentivize monitoring and compliance with environmental regulations through multi-parameter IoT sensors and rewards systems, thereby potentially reducing pollution and encouraging sustainability, which aligns with the goal of reducing GHGs.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
Insufficient data about whether Oxygenchain has received previous funding and about the required new update on their progress and impact.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
Unable to determine if Oxygenchain is a returning grantee and, if so, whether they have updated their proposal accordingly.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
Oxygenchain presents a viable solution to incentivize environmental compliance, and there is mention of an actual team and demonstrations of their concept, indicating both intent and credibility.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information provided that indicates whether Oxygenchain has engaged in such activities; therefore, a definitive answer cannot be given.