User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 29 Mar 2024 12:15 AM
Project has a clear public good impact.
The project description 'Autem facilis invent' is too vague and does not provide sufficient information to determine the public good impact.
Project is not against Gitcoin's community guidelines.
There is no information suggesting that the project is against community guidelines; however, the lack of detailed description warrants further investigation.
Project has evident usage/utility (dApps, protocols, tools, infrastructure, etc).
The project description is incomplete and does not provide evidence of usage/utility.
Project is open-source.
There are no Github details provided to verify whether the project is open-source.
Project shows signs of activity (development, social media presence, etc).
The project lacks a Twitter handle and GitHub details, which means there is no accessible information on recent activity.
The project's community is not exclusive and is welcoming to new members.
Without social media or Github information, it's impossible to gauge the inclusivity of the community.
Has the project been substantially funded by other means (ICO, token sales, private funding)?
There are no details about the project's funding, rendering an assessment impossible at this stage.
Project is in need of funding.
Without financial information related to the project, it is not possible to tell if it is in need of funding.
Project applies to one of the following categories: Infrastructure, DApps, Outreach/Community, Software Development, Tooling, or Research.
The project description is too vague to determine if it fits into any of the specified categories.
Project does not have a dependency on a single centralised party (no single point of failure).
There is insufficient information to understand the project's architecture and determine if there's a single point of failure.