DAO Drops
DAO Drops, a sub-project of dOrg.tech, develops web3 grants tooling and research to support grants managers. Currently focusing on open-source funding tools for privacy and onboarding bots.Application
Applied on: 6 Aug 2024 04:36 AM
Approved
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 6 Aug 2024 05:00 AM
CollabTech project - organisations on-chain, evolution of B2B SaaS, network states tooling & DAO tooling, and future of work; projects advancing reputation, governance & decision making, operations (accounting, sales automation, inventory management, talent, etc), community, and contributor tooling!
The DAO Drops project aligns well with advancing DAO tooling, governance, community, and contributor tooling, supporting the coordination and efficiency of DAOs and grant round operators.
Commercial viability or perennial Public Goods: projects addressing a clear need for a specific target user and with the ability to continue to deliver value over time (financial sustainability through business model and/or immutability)
DAO Drops addresses specific needs for web3 grant round operators and DAO operators, and it demonstrates financial sustainability through ongoing funding from multiple sources (Ethereum Foundation, Octant, other clients).
Maximum project development duration of 12 weeks (i.e. value delivered within 12 weeks)
The project timeline indicates that value will be delivered within three months, aligning with the 12-week development duration criterion.
Threshold: Projects must declare a “threshold” (minimum amount of funds needed to complete the project/feature/prototype and deliver value). Thoroughness in defining their threshold and feasibility (threshold within the range of match-funding available) will be key for approval into the round.
Projects not able to attain the threshold (with combined donations + match funding), will not receive match funding but can still keep donations.
The project description does not include a clear declaration of the threshold amount needed to complete the proposed activities and deliver value. Additional information is needed to assess this criterion thoroughly.
General Criteria: Incomplete, poorly structured, unfeasible, or otherwise poorly conceived applications will be rejected.
The application is complete and well-structured, detailing the project's history, activities, next steps, team, and sustainability plans. The feasibility of the project appears high based on past successes and detailed plans for future developments.