User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 9 Aug 2024 12:01 PM
At least one project lead must be a member of the OpenCivics Consortium
The project application does not specify if any of the project leads are members of the OpenCivics Consortium.
Projects must conduct research that is Creative Commons as a public good
The project application does not explicitly state that the research will be conducted under Creative Commons as a public good.
Research must fall into one of the focus areas listed in the round description
The project description mentions gathering and analyzing data regarding the effectiveness of combining QF and ABC for community projects, which might align with the focus areas, but it is not explicitly confirmed.
Projects must agree to coordinate and collaborate during and after the round with other grantees to collate and present their research progress in a Grantee Impact Showcase prior to GG22
The project application does not mention an agreement to coordinate and collaborate with other grantees for a Grantee Impact Showcase.
Grant applications must direct funds to a multi-signature wallet
The project application does not provide information about directing funds to a multi-signature wallet.
Projects must indicate what collaborative mechanism they will utilize to govern, evaluate and compensate participant contributions (Coordinape, DeWork, Charmverse, Notion, DAO Haus, Google Docs & Sheets, etc)
The project indicates 'Other' as their collaborative governance mechanism, but it does not specify which mechanism they intend to use.
Projects must indicate reasonable and verifiable milestones for the following possible funding amounts received: $1,000; $3,000; $6,000
The project application does not indicate any milestones for the given funding amounts.