CARBON Copy
We provide weekly news, education, and analytical insights on Web3 regenerative finance, along with a comprehensive ReFi project database and a monthly newsletter in collaboration with ReFi DAO.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 2 Aug 2024 01:00 PM
The Grant must be in support of or directly advance the Asian public goods ecosystem; or at least one founder identifies him/herself as Asian. We will refer to the [public goods report](https://www.gccofficial.org/explore.html#report) released by GCC last December for the definition of public goods.
At least one founder identifies as Asian (Savan Wijewardene - Sri Lankan, Surekha Yadav - Singaporean), and the project aims to support the ReFi/Web3 impact space as a public good, which aligns with the definition of public goods in the GCC report.
The project must clearly articulate the problem it addresses, the solution, the implementation plan, the financial plan, and demonstrate there is an excellent team or community for execution
The project clearly explains the problem (information void in Web3 ReFi), provides a solution (news, education, database), has an implementation plan (current and future features, roadmap), financial details (current expenditures and funding strategy), and a competent team with relevant experience.
Project must be 3 months old and the project must demonstrate some tangible progress towards their stated goals, with a working MVP is available to the public. We will use Twitter, official website, github, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project has been active for more than 3 months, as indicated by the release of reports and development of tools. It demonstrates tangible progress through its articles, reports, database, and educational tools. The website and Twitter activity provide public evidence of the MVP.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence provided that indicates whether or not the project has encouraged or enabled Sybil attacks or other malicious activities. Further investigation is required.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and [eligibility criteria](https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/gg21-community-round-eligibility-criteria/19003).
While there is no immediate evidence of non-compliance, a detailed review against Gitcoin core rules and specific eligibility criteria is required to fully determine compliance.