RAID-GPNS
Application
Applied on: 1 Nov 2023 11:21 PM
Round: Final test
Approved
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 12:17 PM
Project name must be correctly listed in the application.
The project name 'RAID-GPNS' is correctly listed in the application.
Project must have a description that is coherent and understandable.
The project description, 'Developing the GPN network app and GStack Frontier environment,' is coherent and understandable.
Project must have an accessible link to their primary web presence (website, Twitter, etc.).
The project has provided accessible links to its GitHub and Twitter profiles.
Project must reflect open-source values and work in the public domain.
The evaluation does not mention any specific open source licenses; however, the presence of a GitHub repository suggests that the project may be open source.
Project must have had more than 5 commits in the past 3 months on their primary Github repo.
According to the provided GitHub activity data, the primary GitHub repo has had 0 commits in the past 3 months.
The primary repository must show signs of active maintenance (issues and PRs are being addressed).
The primary GitHub repo shows no sign of active maintenance with 0 pull requests merged and 0 issues opened in the past 3 months.
Project must not be a 'token only' project without a working product or prototype.
The provided information is not sufficient to determine if there is a working product or prototype apart from any tokens associated with the project.
Project founders or leaders must be doxxed with Gitcoin.
There is no information provided about the doxxing of project founders or leaders with Gitcoin.
Project must align with Gitcoin's mission of funding open web development.
The project aims to develop a network app and technology environment which may align with the open web development; however, more specific details would be needed for a conclusive assessment.
Project must not be involved in any illegal activity or unethical practices, such as scams.
There is no explicit evidence of illegal activity or unethical practices; however, without additional background on the project, it's not possible to conclusively rule this out.