User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 6 Aug 2024 04:01 AM
The Grant must be in support of or directly advance the Asian public goods ecosystem; or at least one founder identifies him/herself as Asian. We will refer to the [public goods report](https://www.gccofficial.org/explore.html#report) released by GCC last December for the definition of public goods.
The project aims to provide education empowerment and decentralized certification, which supports the Asian public goods ecosystem. Additionally, at least one founder identifies as Asian.
The project must clearly articulate the problem it addresses, the solution, the implementation plan, the financial plan, and demonstrate there is an excellent team or community for execution
The application describes the problem, solution, and team members but lacks detailed information on the implementation plan and financial plan.
Project must be 3 months old and the project must demonstrate some tangible progress towards their stated goals, with a working MVP is available to the public. We will use Twitter, official website, github, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project may be over 3 months old, but it lacks a public website or social media presence to verify its progress and MVP status.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence provided in the application that suggests the project is encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and [eligibility criteria](https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/gg21-community-round-eligibility-criteria/19003).
While the information provided does not indicate any non-compliance, insufficient details are available to fully assess compliance with all Gitcoin core rules and eligibility criteria.