User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Aug 2024 06:01 AM
The Grant must be in support of or directly advance the Asian public goods ecosystem; or at least one founder identifies him/herself as Asian. We will refer to the [public goods report](https://www.gccofficial.org/explore.html#report) released by GCC last December for the definition of public goods.
At least one founder identifies as Asian. The project aims to make telegram-based crypto more accessible in Asia, which can support the Asian public goods ecosystem.
The project must clearly articulate the problem it addresses, the solution, the implementation plan, the financial plan, and demonstrate there is an excellent team or community for execution
The project did not provide detailed information about the problem it addresses, the solution, the implementation plan, or the financial plan.
Project must be 3 months old and the project must demonstrate some tangible progress towards their stated goals, with a working MVP is available to the public. We will use Twitter, official website, github, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
There is no information about the age of the project or tangible progress, and no Twitter, website, or GitHub links were provided to verify this.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence provided either for or against the project encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of manipulation.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and [eligibility criteria](https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/gg21-community-round-eligibility-criteria/19003).
It is unclear without more detailed information whether the project complies with all Gitcoin core rules and eligibility criteria.