laputa
An on-chain multiplayer building game with an in-game economy, terraforming, cooperative gameplay, DeFi integration, and resource management set in a world of floating cities.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 11:56 AM
Project must be related to the theme 'How We Connect: Media, Art and Content'
The project LAPUTA is described as a fully on-chain multiplayer game, which, although it can bring people together through gaming, does not specifically fall within the categories of media, art, or content as outlined for the round.
Project must have demonstrable evidence of public traction or usage
Based on the information provided, there is no clear evidence of public traction or usage mentioned for LAPUTA. User engagement data or external validation would be required for a definitive assessment.
Project or team must have a proven track record of reliability and ethical conduct
There is insufficient information to determine the reliability and ethical conduct of the LAPUTA team. More insight into past projects or endorsements by recognized entities would be needed to evaluate this criterion.
Project must be open source with a clear contributor licensing agreement
There is a link to the project's Github repository, but without specific details on licensing agreements and open-source nature of the project, this criterion cannot be assessed conclusively.
Project must be currently deployed on the Ethereum mainnet or testnet, or on an Ethereum Layer 2 network
While the project description references usage of Optimism, a Layer 2 network, there is no explicit information regarding its current deployment on any Ethereum network in the description provided.
Project must include a clear description and documentation
The project description provided is thorough, covering aspects of its gameplay mechanics, economic model, and the broader vision for the LAPUTA game.
Project must have been updated or meaningfully active within the past 6 months
Based on the user Github activity data, there have been 30 commits in the past 3 months, indicating recent activity. No information about issues or pull requests is provided, though.
Project must have an active community or plan to develop community engagement
Information about the project's community engagement is not provided. The presence of Twitter and Github links suggests efforts to engage a community, yet specifics of this activity are lacking.