ImpactEvaluation.Foundation 🌱 IEF

ImpactEvaluation.Foundation 🌱 IEF

Create a collaborative, open-source platform to consolidate best practices in ecological impact verification, offer training for impact verifiers, and develop a transparent marketplace for verification services.
Application
Applied on: 5 Aug 2024 03:02 PM
Rejected
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 5 Aug 2024 04:00 PM
CollabTech project - organisations on-chain, evolution of B2B SaaS, network states tooling & DAO tooling, and future of work; projects advancing reputation, governance & decision making, operations (accounting, sales automation, inventory management, talent, etc), community, and contributor tooling!
The project advances reputation and operations in impact evaluation, aligning with objectives like reputation, governance, and accounting.
Commercial viability or perennial Public Goods: projects addressing a clear need for a specific target user and with the ability to continue to deliver value over time (financial sustainability through business model and/or immutability)
The project aims to build a marketplace with a fee-based business model, addressing the needs of both Regen projects and impact investors, ensuring ongoing value.
Maximum project development duration of 12 weeks (i.e. value delivered within 12 weeks)
The project outlines that the training program for impact verifiers can be delivered in 10-12 weeks, which fits within the required timeframe.
Threshold: Projects must declare a “threshold” (minimum amount of funds needed to complete the project/feature/prototype and deliver value). Thoroughness in defining their threshold and feasibility (threshold within the range of match-funding available) will be key for approval into the round. Projects not able to attain the threshold (with combined donations + match funding), will not receive match funding but can still keep donations.
The project declares a threshold of $500, but the explanation does not provide detailed breakdowns or justify how this amount will enable them to deliver the project milestones.
General Criteria: Incomplete, poorly structured, unfeasible, or otherwise poorly conceived applications will be rejected.
The application is thorough and well-structured, providing detailed plans, objectives, and a roadmap to ensure feasibility.