ReFi Tanzania
A Tanzanian project integrating blockchain to enhance waste management and economic incentives for waste pickers, aiming for environmental regeneration and sustainable technological adoption.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 12:54 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
Based on the project's Twitter account and website domain, the project appears to be at least 3 months old.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. - Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
The proposal outlines a project primarily focused on climate solutions through a web3 waste regeneration system and environmental regeneration, fulfilling the criteria.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. - We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
The application mentions project updates and achievements, but it's not clear if they received funding in a previous round or have minted Hypercerts. Additional verification is needed.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The proposal includes updates on the progress, plans for use of additional funding, and a rough timeline, indicating an updated and reflective proposal process.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. - Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. - Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The proposal presents a credible project with a clear application of web3 technologies to climate solutions and outlines the team's intention to build and develop their project further.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
No information was provided that indicates any encouragement or enabling of Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation, but this requires further investigation to confirm.