Ayowecca Uganda : Training rural farmers & indigenous communities on regenerative agriculture, providing women & girls with new skills for economic empowerment and planting fruit trees in school & health centers
Uganda-based project focuses on ecosystem restoration, climate change mitigation, agroforestry, and community empowerment by planting trees, supporting education, and promoting sustainable agriculture and women's vocational training.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:04 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
According to the provided project website, which is assumed to have an established domain registration, and the presence of a Twitter account, the project seems to be older than 3 months.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project is focused on regenerative agriculture, training in sustainable farming practices, promoting agroforestry and ecosystem restoration, all of which contribute to GHG reduction and climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
The grantee has provided a detailed update on their progress, impact, and challenges faced since the previous funding round.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The grantee has updated their proposal with plans on how they intend to use additional funding, including expanding their training space and tackling the restoration of their greenhouse, and have conveyed a vision for the future of their project.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**.
The project demonstrates viability through its detailed objectives, a proven track record of activities, and clear rationale on how they address climate change. The team appears to have the necessary expertise and commitment to continue their project.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no provided information indicating that the grantee has been involved in Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community. However, due to the nature of this assessment, it is not possible to entirely rule out such activities without an investigation.