ReFi Medellín - First Colombian Node of ReFiDAO responsible for promoting ReFi projects in Medellín.
Empowering Medellín's youth through Web3 and regenerative projects to tackle poverty, inequality, and resource scarcity via hackathons, incubation, and investment.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:04 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The registration date of the Twitter account, website domain, or other public information was not provided, so the project's age cannot be confirmed.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. - Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
The project's description indicates a primary focus on climate solutions through the promotion of ReFi projects that aim to improve environmental and social impact, in line with the criteria of reducing GHGs and contributing to core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) must provide a new update on their progress and impact. You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. - We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
It is not clear from the provided information if this project has received previous funding from Gitcoin and therefore if they are required to submit an update on progress and impact, including Hypercerts.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The provided information does not indicate if the project is a returning grantee, nor does it provide a detailed update on the project proposal, lessons learned, or the intended use of additional funding with a timeline.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. - Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. - Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
Based on the information provided, the project seems viable and credible, with a clear focus on ReFi and a listed team with profiles that indicate expertise in the field, suggesting a genuine intent to build the project.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence provided that suggests the project is engaging in or enabling Sybil attacks or other malicious activities.