R3COLECTA
Environmental impact project in La Paz, Bolivia using technology (Blockchain, Big Data, Apps, Machine Learning) for waste tracking and reforestation, aiming to recycle 7,000 tons and plant 3 million trees.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:05 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project indicates an operational time of 6 months for recycling and 4 months for reforestation, which satisfies the 3-month longevity requirement.
- The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. - Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
The project 'R3COLECTA' is focused on recycling operations, reforestation, and the development of technological tools for environmental impact measurement – all of which are direct climate solutions.
- Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. - We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
There is no information provided to determine whether 'R3COLECTA' received funding in previous rounds or if they have provided updates on their progress and impact or minted Hypercerts.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
It is not clear if 'R3COLECTA' is a returning grantee. Additionally, the information provided does not specify if there are lessons learned from previous work or how additional funding will be used.
- There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. - Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. - Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project 'R3COLECTA' has outlined practical steps it is taking for environmental impact and circular economy, implying genuineness and potential viability. However, no specific information on the team's qualifications is provided.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence or indication that 'R3COLECTA' is involved in encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other malicious activities within the Gitcoin community.