LunarPunk_Labs
Decentralized intelligence agency focused on R&D to ground the concept of "Adaptive Capital" using human-auditable, multi-modal knowledge graphs, and empowering wise, locally-informed decision-making.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:01 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project's establishment date is not provided, and public information stated in the description is not enough to determine the exact age of the project.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. - Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
Although the project involves environmental considerations, the description suggests a broad focus on decentralized intelligence and adaptive capital, not specifically on actions or infrastructure that directly address climate solutions or the reduction of GHGs.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. - We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
The project provides detailed updates on various activities ('Dreaming', 'Doing', 'Designing', and 'Developing'), suggesting progress and an attempt to demonstrate the impact of the previous funding rounds, although no specific accomplishments or impact related to climate solutions are detailed.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
While the project does deliver a narrative on its developments and philosophical underpinnings, it does not offer a clear update on the utilization of previous funding aside from a brief mention, nor does it provide a concrete strategy for the use of additional funds or a specific timeline for future goals.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. - Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. - Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The proposal is abstract and philosophical, lacking specific information about the team's expertise, qualifications, or practical applications that would assure the project is viable and credible in the context of web3 technology and climate solutions.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no evidence provided in the project description to suggest that LunarPunk_Labs is engaging in Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.