A Peer-to-Peer Review Protocol
Developing a decentralized peer-to-peer review protocol to address the lengthy, elitist, and exclusive nature of current academic peer review processes, promoting inclusivity and efficiency.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 06:58 AM
You are a researcher. To qualify for this round you need to have a track record of research. This can be as part of an academic affiliation or as an independent researcher. If you are applying for a grant for your first research project, email hello@metagov.org with more info on why you are the right person to conduct this research.
The provided information does not establish a track record of research for the project. Details regarding academic affiliation or previous independent research work are not provided. Therefore, it is unclear whether the individual or team behind the project meets this criterion.
Governance focus for the research. We will only accept grants that have a clear focus on governance. As noted in the description, you don’t necessarily need to focus exclusively on DAO or web3 governance, but your research needs to be applicable to decentralized governance broadly. A focus on Arbitrum or Uniswap is appreciated but not required.
The project aims to develop a decentralized peer-review protocol, which is applicable to decentralized governance, especially in the context of scientific research and credibility in knowledge dissemination. This aligns with the governance research focus.
No for-profit funding. If you have received VC funding or any other kind of funding that requires a return on investment, then it will not qualify. It is ok if you’ve received other grants.
There is no information provided regarding the funding status of the project. Therefore, it is not possible to determine whether the project has received for-profit funding or funding that requires a return on investment.
No retrospective funding. The research must either be launched soon or currently ongoing. Completed projects are not eligible for funding in this round.
Based on the project description, the initiative proposes future research directions and development, which suggests that the research is not completed and is either currently ongoing or will be launched soon. Therefore, it meets the criterion of no retrospective funding.