Astrochain
AstroChain aims to unite astronomy enthusiasts in an ecosystem, offering a dApp for NFT-based space content, sky scanning devices, and a metaverse platform for education and research.Application
Applied on: 8 Aug 2024 01:33 AM
Rejected
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 8 Aug 2024 02:01 AM
CollabTech project - organisations on-chain, evolution of B2B SaaS, network states tooling & DAO tooling, and future of work; projects advancing reputation, governance & decision making, operations (accounting, sales automation, inventory management, talent, etc), community, and contributor tooling!
Astrochain focuses primarily on space exploration, NFTs, and science communication, rather than on advancing B2B SaaS, DAO tooling, or traditional operations and governance tools as required for CollabTech.
Commercial viability or perennial Public Goods: projects addressing a clear need for a specific target user and with the ability to continue to deliver value over time (financial sustainability through business model and/or immutability)
Astrochain appears to address a clear need for space enthusiasts and researchers with monetizable features such as NFT minting and metaverse events, suggesting potential for long-term value delivery and financial sustainability.
Maximum project development duration of 12 weeks (i.e. value delivered within 12 weeks)
The project states it will take approximately 4 months (16 weeks) to deliver value for public testing, and a minimum of one year for the Metaverse platform, which exceeds the maximum 12-week development duration requirement.
Threshold: Projects must declare a “threshold” (minimum amount of funds needed to complete the project/feature/prototype and deliver value). Thoroughness in defining their threshold and feasibility (threshold within the range of match-funding available) will be key for approval into the round. Projects not able to attain the threshold (with combined donations + match funding), will not receive match funding but can still keep donations.
The application does not clearly define the funding threshold needed to complete the project, making it difficult to assess the feasibility and appropriateness of the threshold.
General Criteria: Incomplete, poorly structured, unfeasible, or otherwise poorly conceived applications will be rejected.
The application is fairly well-structured and reasonably detailed. However, the feasibility is questionable given the extended timeline and loosely defined threshold.