User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 8 Aug 2024 12:01 PM
At least one project lead must be a member of the OpenCivics Consortium
The project mentions Benjamin Life and Open Civics Community, which implies connection with OpenCivics.
Projects must conduct research that is Creative Commons as a public good
The application emphasizes open research and experimentation, indicating the intent to share knowledge as a public good.
Research must fall into one of the focus areas listed in the round description
The project focuses on enhancing funding mechanisms, accountability, impact tracking, and fostering a collaborative community, which are likely to align with the round's focus areas.
Projects must agree to coordinate and collaborate during and after the round with other grantees to collate and present their research progress in a Grantee Impact Showcase prior to GG22
While the application does not explicitly state this commitment, the regular posts on the Gitcoin forum and active participation in community discussions suggest a willingness to coordinate and collaborate.
Grant applications must direct funds to a multi-signature wallet
The application does not provide information about the use of a multi-signature wallet.
Projects must indicate what collaborative mechanism they will utilize to govern, evaluate and compensate participant contributions (Coordinape, DeWork, Charmverse, Notion, DAO Haus, Google Docs & Sheets, etc)
The application specifies the use of Notion for collaborative governance.
Projects must indicate reasonable and verifiable milestones for the following possible funding amounts received: $1,000; $3,000; $6,000
The application clearly outlines specific, reasonable, and verifiable milestones for each funding amount.