User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 3 Aug 2024 08:00 PM
The Grant must be in support of or directly advance the Asian public goods ecosystem; or at least one founder identifies him/herself as Asian. We will refer to the [public goods report](https://www.gccofficial.org/explore.html#report) released by GCC last December for the definition of public goods.
At least one founder identifies as Asian, fulfilling the requirement to directly advance the Asian public goods ecosystem.
The project must clearly articulate the problem it addresses, the solution, the implementation plan, the financial plan, and demonstrate there is an excellent team or community for execution
The application mentions the open-source nature and intended uses of the project, but lacks a comprehensive articulation of the problem it addresses, detailed solution, and financial plan.
Project must be 3 months old and the project must demonstrate some tangible progress towards their stated goals, with a working MVP is available to the public. We will use Twitter, official website, github, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project lacks public information such as a website, Twitter, or GitHub to verify the age and tangible progress towards the goals.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
No evidence of Sybil attacks or malicious activity is provided, but lack of public information makes it difficult to definitively determine compliance.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and [eligibility criteria](https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/gg21-community-round-eligibility-criteria/19003).
Compliance with Gitcoin core rules cannot be confirmed due to insufficient public information about the project.