Solarpunk Nomads: Nomad Hub and Climate Resilience Tracker
Developed community-owned solar-powered vehicles; hosted workshops in India and Europe; building digital tools for climate resilience, interactive maps, a nomadic platform, and a decentralized app by 2025.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 05:44 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project describes activities and progress throughout 2022 and 2023, indicating it is over 3 months old.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project is centered around promoting sustainable mobility and climate resilience, which will contribute to the reduction of GHGs and the project seems to incorporate the development of web3 tools aimed at furthering climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha & Beta rounds. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha & Beta round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
The project's description includes progress but does not clearly state whether it has received funding in previous rounds or specify the progress since the last funding round, as required by the criterion.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The available information details the project's roadmap and achievements but does not explicitly discuss lessons learned, nor does it provide specifics on how additional Gitcoin funding will be used and the impact it will make. It does provide a rough timeline, but the response to this criterion is missing key components outlined in the requirement.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The projects outlined by the Solarpunk Nomads appear to be grounded in practical attempts at sustainability and community building, with evidence of real-world activities and tools that support climate action and web3 dynamics.