DANC3

.
Application
Applied on: 26 Jul 2024 08:05 PM
Rejected
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 26 Jul 2024 09:00 PM
CollabTech project - organisations on-chain, evolution of B2B SaaS, network states tooling & DAO tooling, and future of work; projects advancing reputation, governance & decision making, operations (accounting, sales automation, inventory management, talent, etc), community, and contributor tooling!
The project does not clearly align with the specified CollabTech domains such as organisations on-chain, B2B SaaS evolution, governance tooling, or operations. It focuses on culture and entertainment on-chain through live experiences, which is not targeted by the stated criteria.
Commercial viability or perennial Public Goods: projects addressing a clear need for a specific target user and with the ability to continue to deliver value over time (financial sustainability through business model and/or immutability)
The project aims to be commercially viable by landing major clients and leveraging NFTs and word-of-mouth marketing. However, the long-term sustainability and perennial value delivery are uncertain due to reliance on securing clients.
Maximum project development duration of 12 weeks (i.e. value delivered within 12 weeks)
The project timeline indicates a goal to land the first major client by November 2024, which exceeds the 12-week maximum duration for delivering value.
Threshold: Projects must declare a 'threshold' (minimum amount of funds needed to complete the project/feature/prototype and deliver value). Thoroughness in defining their threshold and feasibility (threshold within the range of match-funding available) will be key for approval into the round. Projects not able to attain the threshold (with combined donations + match funding), will not receive match funding but can still keep donations.
The project did not provide a clear threshold amount or detailed feasibility for completing the project. This lack of specificity makes it challenging to evaluate thoroughly.
General Criteria: Incomplete, poorly structured, unfeasible, or otherwise poorly conceived applications will be rejected.
The application is complete and provides some structure to the proposed project, but it lacks specificity in critical areas like financial thresholds and detailed timelines, impacting its overall feasibility.