Ana 🌳🐒🎙Community Building
Ana, a grantee and public goods builder in the Gitcoin community, created a 24/7 two-week broadcast supporting Gitcoin Grants and stewarded a daily educational segment. She's also the founder of KOKO DAO, preserving Colombian forests.User Review
R1
Reviewed on 28 Mar 2024 04:51 PM
This round focuses on *individuals only*. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission. We invite collaborators on one effort to submit grant proposals individually, detailing what and how they personally contributed. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.
Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
Essential intents: https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/update-gitcoin-s-ratified-essential-intents-2023-2024-and-a-recap-of-our-successes/16818
Ecosystem Collective: https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/introducing-gitcoin-s-ecosystem-collective/17954
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin. Some (non-exhaustive) examples:
- educational content, eg. a guide on how to donate on our platform
- promotional content, eg running a twitter space to cover our rounds
- data analysis, eg. a data analysis of previous donations
- operations, eg. running a grants round
- governance, eg. adding meaningful contributions to the forum discussions
- community support, eg. helping out users in our discord
- platform and protocol dev, eg. pull requests or standalone add-ons
This round will focus on retroactive work only, i.e. work delivered in the past. For planned work, go to http://gitcoin.co/citizens. Only one proposal is allowed per grantee.
All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing all captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views.) The submission should include proof of impact, including links to where the work was delivered and received (e.g, content creation needs supporting usage analytics, governance participation should have relevant links to gov posts, individual involvement in a collective effort should have specific dates, links to Twitter space, or recordings.)
The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received. Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. Examples of these include bug reports with minimal impact, non-strategic comments on the governance forum, translations of gitcoin content and other communication efforts which can easily be automated (AI, Google translate).
Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.
Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 28 Mar 2024 09:01 AM
Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing
Without access to the detailed document, an accurate assessment cannot be provided.
Individuals only. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.
The title 'Ana 🌳🐒🎙Community Building' indicates the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding, adhering to the requirement.
Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
The project description details how the work contributes to community building and supporting public goods, which aligns with Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin.
The grant proposal describes specific initiatives like organizing 'Let’s GROW LIVE GG19' and founding 'KOKO DAO' that supported the Gitcoin ecosystem.
This round will focus on rewarding retroactive work only
The project description reviews past events and the applicant's previous engagement, indicating the work is retroactive.
All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing and linking to captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views)
The project outlines the impact of the work with captured data such as hours of broadcast, number of speakers and listeners, and channel partners.
Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received.
The described impact, such as 12,000 listeners and 94,000 reactions, suggests the effort was well-received and had more than minimal impact.
Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.
The proposal does not specify whether the contributions were compensated previously by Gitcoin in a different capacity, making it uncertain if the rule of not being paid twice applies.